Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier

Case # 15-cv-60716
Case Name Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier
Jurisdiction US District Court for S.D. FL
Summary

Plaintiffs allege that Defendant, Godiva, improperly printed bank account numbers on sales receipts.  This printing is in violation of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act and potentially exposes consumers to credit card fraud and identity theft.

Final Approval Date 09/28/2016
Result
  1. Final Approval granted.
  2. All objections were overruled.
  3. Objectors Isaacson and Price appealed the Final Approval.
  4. Class counsel motioned for an appeal bond of $115,934 ($10,000 in Rule 39 appeal costs, $31,594 in administration costs, and $74,340 in interest on the settlement fund).
  5. The Court granted an appeal bond of $2,500, to be posted jointly and severally.
  6. The appeal bond was posted.
  7. Oral arguments were held on January 12, 2018.
Dismissal of Last Appeal ongoing
Attachments Docket Report.pdf
First Amended Class Action Complaint.pdf
Amended Preliminary Approval Order.pdf
Final Approval Order.pdf
Motion for Appeal Bond.pdf
Reply in Support of Motion for Appeal Bond.pdf
Report and Recommendation on Appeal Bond.pdf
Order Adopting Report and Recommendation on Appeal Bond.pdf
Combined Appeal Docket.pdf
Added to Index
Last Updated

Objection of Eric Alan Isaacson

Objectors Eric Alan Isaacson
Signers John W. Davis
Attorneys John W. Davis
C. Benjamin Nutley
Eric Alan Isaacson
Summary
  1. Objectors are unfairly denied the right to comment on the fee request.
  2. Attorneys' fees are improperly calculated.
  3. Class representative is inadequate.
  4. Class representative incentive award is excessive.

Eric Alan Isaacson appeared as his own attorney at the appellate stage.

Attachments Objection of Eric Alan Isaacson.pdf
Isaacson Response to Motion for Final Approval.pdf
Isaacson Objection to Fee Award.pdf
Appeal of Objector Isaacson.pdf
Isaacson Opposition to Motion for Appeal Bond.pdf
Isaacson Objection to Report and Recommendation on Appeal Bond.pdf
Response to Isaacson Objection to Report and Recommendation on Appeal Bond.pdf
Nutley Appearance for Objector-Appellant Isaacson.pdf
Isaacson Appearance for Objector-Appellant Isaacson.pdf
Added to Index
Last Updated

Objection of James H. Price

Objectors James H. Price
Signers W. Allen McDonald
Attorneys W. Allen McDonald
Summary
  1. Notice does not provide sufficient information regarding attorneys' fees.
  2. Attorneys' fees are excessive and improperly calculated.
  3. Class counsel has done insufficient work to justify the settlement.
  4. Class representative incentive award is excessive.
Attachments Objection of James H. Price.pdf
Price Response to Motion for Final Approval.pdf
Price Objection to Fee Award.pdf
Appeal of Objector Price.pdf
Price Opposition to Motion for Appeal Bond.pdf
Added to Index
Last Updated