Wright v. Nationstar Mortgage

Case # 14-cv-10457
Case Name Wright v. Nationstar Mortgage
Jurisdiction US District Court for N.D. IL
Summary

Plaintiffs allege that Nationstar Mortgage used automated dialing systems and/or prerecorded phone messages to reach them without the express consent of the consumers.  They did so in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA.)

Final Approval Date 08/29/2016
Result
  1. Plaintiff's motioned to perform discovery on objectors, which was denied by the District Court.
  2. Final Approval granted.
  3. All objector appeals were voluntarily dismissed.
Dismissal of Last Appeal 10/25/2016
Attachments Docket Report.pdf
Second Amended Class Action Complaint.pdf
Preliminary Approval Order.pdf
Motion to Conduct Discovery of Objectors.pdf
Plaintiff's Reply In Support of Motion to Conduct Discovery of Objectors.pdf
Transcript of Hearing on Motion for Objector Discovery.pdf
Memorandum Opinion and Order of Final Approval.pdf
Added to Index
Last Updated

Objection of C. Jeffrey Thut

Objectors C. Jeffrey Thut
Signers C. Jeffrey Thut
Attorneys C. Jeffrey Thut
Christopher A. Bandas
Summary
  1. Settlement does not compensate class members on a "per violation" basis.
  2. Attorneys' fees are excessive.
Attachments Objection of C. Jeffrey Thut.pdf
Withdrawal of Thut Objection.pdf
Added to Index
Last Updated

Objection of Connie Pentz

Objectors Connie Pentz
Signers John J. Pentz
Attorneys John J. Pentz
Arthur J. Howe
Summary
  1. Attorneys' fees are excessive.
  2. Attorneys need to disclose their lodestar.
Attachments Objection of Connie Pentz.pdf
Howe Appearance for Objector Pentz.pdf
Correspondence With Pentz Objector.pdf
Pentz Response to Motion to Conduct Discovery of Objectors.pdf
Plaintiff's Opposition to Pentz Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice.pdf
Appeal of Pentz Objector.pdf
Dismissal of Pentz Appeal.pdf
Added to Index
Last Updated

Objection of Amy Jo Mitchell

Objectors Amy Jo Mitchell
Signers W. Allen McDonald
Attorneys W. Allen McDonald
Summary
  1. Class definition is overly vague.
  2. Compensation is inadequate.
  3. Attorneys' fees are excessive.
  4. Class representative awards are excessive.
Attachments Objection of Amy Jo Mitchell.pdf
Correspondence With Mitchell Objector.pdf
Mitchell Response to Motion to Conduct Discovery of Objectors.pdf
Appeal of Mitchell Objector.pdf
Dismissal of Mitchell Appeal.pdf
Added to Index
Last Updated

Objection of William Youngblood, Kerry Youngblood

Objectors William Youngblood
Kerry Youngblood
Signers Brent F. Vullings
Attorneys Brent F. Vullings
Summary
  1. Relief available to class members is unclear.
  2. Notice does not disclose how unclaimed and/or remaining settlement funds will be distributed.
  3. Class representative incentive awards are excessive.
  4. Attorneys' fees are excessive.
  5. Requirements to opt out are unduly burdensome.
Attachments Objection of William and Kerry Youngblood.pdf
Correspondence With Youngblood Objectors.pdf
Youngblood Response to Motion to Conduct Discovery of Objectors.pdf
Appeal of Youngblood Objectors.pdf
Dismissal of Youngblood Appeal.pdf
Added to Index
Last Updated