Morrow v. Ascena Retail Group

Case # 16-cv-03340
Case Name Morrow v. Ascena Retail Group
Jurisdiction US District Court for S.D. NY

Defendants operate both regular retail stores and "outlet" stores under the brands "Ann Taylor" and "LOFT."  The outlet stores offer products ostensibly at significant discounts off the retail price at regular retail stores.  However, Plaintiffs allege that the supposed savings are artificial - the products at the outlet stores were never sold at the retail locations.  Consumers were lead to believe they were receiving a significant discount off of an illusory "original retail price" and purchased products believing they were receiving a bargain.

Final Approval Date 04/25/2018
  1. Final Approval granted.
  2. All objections were overruled.
  3. Objector Sweeney appealed the Final Approval.
  4. The Sweeney appeal was voluntarily dismissed.
Dismissal of Last Appeal 07/16/2018
Attachments Docket Report.pdf
First Amended Class Action Complaint.pdf
Preliminary Approval Order.pdf
Plaintiffs' Response to Objections.pdf
Defendant's Response to Objections.pdf
Final Approval Order.pdf
Added to Index
Last Updated

Objection of Pamela Sweeney

Objectors Pamela Sweeney
Signers Pamela Sweeney
  1. Attorneys' fees are excessive and improperly calculated.
Attachments Objection of Pamela Sweeney.pdf
Appeal of Objector Sweeney.pdf
Dismissal of Sweeney Appeal.pdf
Sweeney Appeal Docket.pdf
Added to Index
Last Updated

Objection of Becky Morrow

Objectors Becky Morrow
Signers Becky Morrow
Attorneys George W. Cochran
  1. Varying damage standards prevent the certification of a nationwide class.
  2. Cash portion of the settlement provides inadequate relief.
  3. Coupon portion of the settlement is overvalued.
  4. Attorneys' fees are excessive and improperly calculated.

NOTE:  Attorney Cochran did not file an appearance in this case.  He was described in the objection as a "personal attorney."

Attachments Objection of Becky Morrow.pdf
Added to Index
Last Updated