Connor v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

Case # 10-cv-01284
Case Name Connor v. JPMorgan Chase Bank
Jurisdiction US District Court for S.D. CA
Summary

Plaintiffs allege that Defendant repeatedly contacted consumers on their cell phones.  These calls were in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).

Final Approval Date 02/05/2015
Result
  1. Final Approval granted.
  2. In response to objections from Objector Davis, the settlement was modified to identify more class members.
  3. As a result of this modification, Objector Davis motioned for an award of $345,000 ($342,500 in fees to Attorney Nutley and an incentive payment of $2,500 to Objector Davis).  This award was granted and paid out of Class Counsel's fee.
  4. The Kron and Camarista objections were voluntarily withdrawn prior to Final Approval.
Dismissal of Last Appeal N/A
Attachments Docket Report.pdf
First Amended Complaint.pdf
First Preliminary Approval Order.pdf
Order to File Second Amended Complaint.pdf
Second Amended Complaint.pdf
Second Preliminary Approval Order.pdf
Plaintiffs' Response to Objections.pdf
Defendant's Response to Objections.pdf
Final Judgment.pdf
Added to Index
Last Updated

Objection of John W. Davis

Objectors John W. Davis
Signers John W. Davis
Attorneys John W. Davis
C. Benjamin Nutley
Summary
  1. Relief is inadequate given statutorily allowed damages.
  2. Attorneys' fees are excessive.
  3. Release is overbroad.
  4. Claims process is overly burdensome.
  5. Cy pres provisions are improper.
  6. Multiple subclasses are improper.
Attachments Objection of John W. Davis.pdf
Davis Appearance for Objector Davis.pdf
Nutley Appearance for Objector Davis.pdf
Second Objection of John W. Davis.pdf
Plaintiffs' Response to Second Davis Objection.pdf
Motion for Settlement with Objector Davis.pdf
Order Granting Motion for Settlement with Objector Davis.pdf
Added to Index
Last Updated

Objection of Stephen Kron, Cheryl Kron

Objectors Stephen Kron
Cheryl Kron
Signers Stephen Kron
Cheryl Kron
Scott A. Kron
Attorneys Scott A. Kron
Summary
  1. Claims process is overly burdensome.
  2. Claims deadline is improperly before the filing of the fee motion.
  3. Release is overbroad.
  4. Attorneys' fees are excessive.
  5. Cy pres provisions are improper.
Attachments Objection of Stephen and Cheryl Kron.pdf
Kron Appearance for Kron Objectors.pdf
Withdrawal of Cheryl Kron Objection.pdf
Kron Deposition Transcript.pdf
Kron Reply to Plaintiffs' Response to Objections.pdf
Kron Reply to Defendants' Response to Objections.pdf
Withdrawal of Stephen Kron Objection.pdf
Added to Index
Last Updated

Objection of Glenice May Camarista, Janiley Lynne Camarista

Objectors Glenice May Camarista
Janiley Lynne Camarista
Signers Joseph Darrell Palmer
Attorneys Joseph Darrell Palmer
Summary
  1. Attorneys' fees should be based on actual recovery by the class.
  2. Attorneys have not earned a lodestar multiplier.
  3. Objectors' fees should be based on benefit to the class.
Attachments Objection of Glenice and Janiley Camarista.pdf
Palmer Appearance for Camarista Objectors.pdf
Withdrawal of Camarista Objections.pdf
Added to Index
Last Updated